Ho messo il doppione di un post in piazzetta qui, perché forse è attinente più all'estetica della fotografia:
http://us7.campaign-archive1.com/?u=f9d ... 4d743840c4
A chi interessasse...
Un brano, AMMMP interessante base di discussione, della newsletter: "Next, creativity involves an audience. Just being imaginative and close to original isn’t quite enough. If the result were plain nasty, it wouldn’t count. It has to appeal. One of the more brutal aspects of any creative medium is that there’s always a judgment of success. If respected judges, or simply enough other people, think your images are good, then you have a confirmed place on the creative ladder. Winning prizes and being published are good indicators, but what do you do about the state of being unrecognised? Look at the timeline of any admired photographer, and it begins, quite naturally, with obscurity. Natural, but not at all comfortable, with attacks of self-doubt likely to happen every so often. As one young Chinese photographer came up and asked me after a talk in Hangzhou, ‘What if no-one likes my work?’ A reasonable question, with the possibility of one good answer (keep going and people will eventually see how good it is) and one bad one (it’s not good enough). Do you fall back on the van Gogh and Gauguin model of being too far ahead of your time? Or perhaps go in the other direction and try to please an audience by making images in a style you know that they already like? That second option might turn out to be not very satisfying, which would matter less if you’re more concerned with recognition than breaking new ground."